2162

Views

Antarctic Commission Considers Giant Marine Protected Areas

alt
A proposed marine protected area in the East Antarctic would protect penguin foraging grounds (file image)

By China Dialogue Ocean 2018-10-19 08:50:02

[By Fermin Koop]

The future of the Antarctic hangs in the balance. Twenty-four countries and the European Union are meeting in Hobart, Australia, from October 22 to vote on a proposal to extend ocean protections around the South Pole. There have been several failed attempts as countries have strong interests in the region that they want to safeguard.

It’s the annual meeting of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), an international organisation that regulates the use of resources in the Antarctic, and which in 2002 agreed to create a network of marine protected areas (MPAs). In 2016, countries and civil society groups agreed to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030.

“The Antarctic is the last frontier where exploitation of natural resources on an industrial scale hasn’t arrived yet,” said Milko Schvartzman, Argentine marine conservation specialist. Argentina is one of seven nations to maintain a territorial claim on the Antarctic Peninsula. It also has the most bases and personnel stationed there.

“It’s one of the few places in the world that hasn’t been affected by human activity and because of that it is essential for scientific research,” added Schvartzman.

Nevertheless, progress has been slow so far. In 2009, CCAMLR member states agreed on the first marine protected area, covering 94,000 square kilometres south of the South Orkney Islands. Then, in 2016, the Commission made headlines when it successfully negotiated the world’s largest marine park, covering 1.55 million square kilometres in the Ross Sea.

These achievements raised hopes for similar breakthroughs during the following annual meetings, which seek to expand the current MPAs and create new ones. But discussions have dragged on. Countries have opposed the extension of MPAs, asserting their right to access waters rich in krill and other resources such as minerals and oil.

If created, it would be the largest natural reserve anywhere in the world

The proposals

There are three distinct proposals on the table at this year’s talks.

The oldest one is to protect three large blocks of ocean and seafloor along the East Antarctic in an area rich in cold-water corals and penguin foraging grounds. It has been discussed for six years in a row at the CCAMLR talks, but without significant progress.

Over the years, the proposal has been scaled back. Initially, it proposed seven areas covering 1.9 million square kilometres of ocean but this has been reduced to three areas covering one million square kilometres. It will protect unique ecosystems and features, including sites where Antarctic bottom water is formed (this is the coldest water in the ocean which has considerable influence over the movement of currents).

Existing and proposed marine protected areas in the Antarctic (Map: R M Roura Dec 2017, based on MPA map by Pew Charitable Trusts, 2016)

The second proposal (now under discussion by the scientific committee – the stage before it reaches the commission), is to create an MPA of 1.8 million square kilometres in the area of the Weddell Sea and adjacent to the Antarctic Peninsula. If created, it would be the largest natural reserve anywhere in the world.

The Weddell MPA was first put forward by the EU and has gained the support of several countries. Greenpeace launched a campaign to pressure governments to approve it that was backed by two million people. It’s hoped the proposal will reach the commission this year, where its approval will be discussed.

“This would create a safe haven for penguins, whales and krill, safeguarding their environment,” said Louisa Casson, senior oceans campaigner at Greenpeace. “The Weddell Sea is one of the most pristine places on the planet. We have a chance to protect it before any damage is done.”

Finally, Argentina and Chile have worked jointly on a proposal to create an MPA to the west of the Antarctic Peninsula. It’s at an early stage and will be submitted to the scientific committee at this year’s meeting. The area is particularly vulnerable to tourism impacts, fishing activity and global warming.

“It’s the area of the Antarctic and the world most affected by global warming. There has been a massive decrease in the amount of ice. It’s the centre of krill fishing in the Antarctic,” said Rodolfo Werner, senior adviser at the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC), who has been attending CCAMLR meetings for over ten years.

What is at stake?

Experts agree that a failure to extend MPAs in the Antarctic could have severe consequences for its ecosystems. In 2048 the Antarctic Treaty, which bans mining on the continent, among other things, is expected to come up for review.

Geologists estimate that Antarctica holds at least 36 billion barrels of oil and natural gas, although assessments vary widely. A combination of climate change and industrial-scale fishing is already threatening the krill population in Antarctic waters. The penguin population could drop by almost a third by the end of the century due to changes in krill, whose size could diminish by 40%.

Krill populations have already declined by 80% since the 1970s, following the expansion of the krill fishing industry, which is predicted to grow 12% a year over the next three years.

At the same time, Antarctic tourism has also been growing. In the 2017-2018 period 41,966 people visited, 16% more than in the 2011/2012 period, according to the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO).

Likely outcomes

Experts that chinadialogue spoke to had mixed feelings about the talks. Some were hopeful of new protections being passed, while others were more negative.

For Mike Walter, Europe coordinator at ASOC, who worked on the Ross Sea campaign, this year’s meeting “is in a better position” than the one last year thanks to diplomatic efforts in the run up.

Meanwhile, for Mariano Aguas, head of the Antarctic programme at the Argentine NGO Vida Silvestre, there “won’t be much progress” due to differing trenchant positions held by countries.

“CCAMLR risks its reputation if they fail to move forward on anything this year,” said Andrea Kavanagh, director of Pew’s Antarctic and Southern Ocean work. “They promised to have a network of MPAs to preserve biodiversity in the area. If they can’t do that it puts into question what their priorities are.”

What do countries want?

Under CCAMLR rules, all 25 commission members – 24 countries and the European Union – must agree for a proposal to be adopted. The need for a universal consensus has made progress especially challenging, given the differing interests of the negotiating countries.

It boils down to a debate between mainly Western countries that want to establish “no-take” MPAs (where fishing, mining, drilling and other extractive industries are banned), and countries like China and Russia that want to maintain rights to fishing and other forms of extraction, according to Dr Liu Nengye, senior lecturer at the University of Adelaide.

“The debate is between fishing and conservation states. There has been a shift among developed countries that are pushing for no activity in the MPAs. This has not happened yet in China, which has become the world’s largest marine fisheries producer over the last decade,” he said.

“China is moving towards sustainable fishing, which means they want to continue fishing in the future,” he added.

China started fishing for Antarctic krill in 2009 and has rapidly expanded its activities. Alongside Norway and South Korea, they are among the biggest Antarctic krill fishing nations, with Norway leading in terms of catch and processing capacity, and China in the number of vessels.

In 2017, China’s 13th Five-Year Plan for fishing industry technology called for the country to increase its krill fishing and processing capacity. But a white paper on China’s activity in the Antarctic, published the same year by the State Oceanic Administration, included environmental protection as a key principle.

“China does not object to MPAs, but they want to have more time to think about it,” said Jiliang Chen, researcher at Greenovation Hub and specialist on China’s Antarctic policy.

“There is a general agreement that a network [of MPAs] has to be established but fishing countries (such as China) have more concerns.”

A study by Greenpeace analysed the movements of krill fishing vessels in the region and found they were increasingly operating “in the immediate vicinity of penguin colonies and whale feeding grounds”. The study also highlighted the large number of incidents of fishing boats being involved in groundings, oil spills and accidents.

Acknowledging their role, a group of companies responsible for 85% of krill fishing in Antarctic waters announced they would stop activitiesin key areas, including “buffer zones” around penguin breeding grounds. The move has increased the pressure on governments to act on MPAs.

Antarctic marine reserves offer a rare opportunity to conserve and study largely untouched natural areas, experts agree. Although MPA status does little to ward off the effects of climate change, it can help ensure the other activities don’t exacerbate the impacts.

At the same time, Antarctic marine parks are part of a larger international effort to protect 10% of the world’s oceans in MPAs by 2020 – a challenging target considering less than 4% is protected.

“Looking back, much progress has been made. It’s taking a long time but that’s the way it works,” Kavanagh said.

“Countries that only cared about fishing are now making commitments. Russia has done great work on protected areas in the Arctic. China is really concerned about climate change. There’s every reason to have hope and be positive.”

Fermín Koop is an Argentine journalist, specialising in the environment with experience across diverse publications such as the Buenos Aires Herald, Clarín, Ámbito Financiero, Buena Salud and Notio Noticias.

This article appears courtesy of China Dialogue Ocean and may be found in its original form here.

The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Maritime Executive.