5837
Views

Want to Keep Plastic Out of the Ocean? Burn It Like Coal

sintef
Used paper contains large amounts of non-recyclable plastic waste. This photo is taken from Vietnam’s largest paper factory in Can Tho, which supplied waste plastic for the pilot study. Photo: Kåre Helge Karstensen/SINTEF

Published Jun 12, 2022 9:23 PM by Gemini News

[By Kathrine Nitter]

Using non-recyclable plastic waste as an alternative to coal may prevent huge volumes of plastic from being discarded into the oceans – and will also reduce CO2 emissions. This is the conclusion of a recently completed pilot project headed by SINTEF in Vietnam.

Since the 1950s, human beings have generated at least 6.3 billion tonnes of plastic waste. However, only nine percent of this waste has been recycled and only 12 percent utilized as fuel. The remaining 79 percent has been dumped, and much of it has ended up in the oceans.

Most of the plastic that reaches the oceans is non-recyclable and, according to recent studies, even if we continue to develop effective waste collection and recycling systems, there will still be large volumes of plastics that cannot be recycled.

Multiple benefits of local waste management

A pilot project recently completed by SINTEF in Vietnam has concluded that the local incineration of non-recyclable plastic waste as a fuel in cement kilns is a feasible alternative, both on technical and environmental grounds.

The tests carried out to demonstrate that not only are the emissions of the environmental toxins called dioxins not increased if plastic waste is used as a supplementary fuel, but that they also meet the strictest international limiting values for pollutant emissions.

“An approach such as this will significantly boost plastic waste management capacities at local level”, says Senior Research Scientist Kåre Helge Karstensen at SINTEF, who has been heading the project. “It will also save on large volumes of coal and reduce the volumes of plastics and microplastics being discharged into the East and South China Seas”, he says.

Breaking the cycle

According to international studies, Vietnam is responsible for some of the highest levels of plastic discharge to the world’s oceans. The combination of an elongated coastline, a growing use of plastics, and an inadequate waste management infrastructure all mean that the country discharges between 0.28 and 0.73 million tonnes of plastic waste into the oceans every year.

Lee & Man is the largest paper manufacturer in Vietnam, generating about 150 tonnes of waste every day, most of which is plastic. This waste is regarded as non-recyclable and is currently sent to landfills.

However, the plastic waste dumped in landfill sites will gradually break down and be released into groundwater systems and rivers, providing a continuous source of microplastics to the oceans.

In order to break this cycle, researchers working on the OPTOCE project (Ocean Plastic Turned into an Opportunity in Circular Economy) are conducting a full-scale pilot study. Their aim is to explore the possibility of recovering energy and resources from plastic waste for use in a local cement factory, and in doing so replacing the need to use coal and other raw materials.

“More than 200 tonnes of plastic waste were transported to the cement factory, where they were sun-dried, homogenised and fed into a calcination plant as an alternative fuel”, says Karstensen. “We also tested footwear waste from a local shoe factory”, he says.

No increase in emissions

The four-day test involves sampling of emissions by an independent company in order to find out whether the co-processing of plastic waste has a negative impact on emissions, the production process, or product quality. Co-processing involves the use of waste as a raw material or energy source in industrial processes as a substitute for natural mineral resources and fossil fuels, such as coal.

Gas emissions were analysed at an accredited laboratory for normal emissions to the atmosphere, trace organics such as dioxins, acidic exhaust gases and trace metals.

“All emission measurements were in compliance with existing Vietnamese limiting values. Emissions were not increased, nor were other negative effects identified as a result of co-processing of the plastic waste," says Karstensen.

A single factory can save a minimum of 10,000 tonnes of coal every year

The first day of the pilot involved a baseline study in which only coal was used as a fuel. During the next three days a mixture of alternative fuel, plastics and coal were fed into the incinerator in varying proportions. On the final day, only plastic waste and coal were used.

A total of 225 tonnes of plastic waste was co-processed during the pilot study in December 2021, saving about 165 tonnes of coal and reducing CO2 emissions by about 400 tonnes (assuming that the combustion of 1 kg coal produces about 2.42 kg of carbon dioxide).

These results indicate that we can expect the cement factory in Hon Chong alone to incinerate about 17,000 tonnes of paper recycling waste and about 50,000 tonnes of footwear waste annually. This means that from just one factory it will be possible to dispose of about 10,000 tonnes of non-recyclable plastic waste, and save about 10,000 tonnes of coal every year.

“We’ve been monitoring the project for some time and it clearly demonstrates the enormous potential that Vietnam has to reduce its plastic waste discharge to rivers and the oceans, and to cut its greenhouse gas emissions from energy-intensive industries”, says counsellor Jan W. Grythe at the Norwegian Embassy in Vietnam.

“It is also important, not least because of the country’s ambitious commitments made during COP26 to achieve zero emissions by 2050 and to phase-out coal from the energy mix”, he emphasises.

A win-win opportunity

Sadly, more than five billion tonnes of plastic are currently sitting in landfill and other disposal sites or polluting natural habitats across the world. This is because only a small proportion of our plastics can be recycled and may be because some of the plastic has already been recycled several times, or because it contains additives that make it unsuitable for recycling.

The Mekong river is the world’s tenth largest in terms of water discharge, with a catchment area extending over 810,000 square kilometers. Large volumes of plastic waste are carried in the river on their way to the ocean. Photo: Kåre Helge Karstensen/SINTEF

“This non-recyclable plastic waste will gradually break down and be released into our groundwater systems and rivers”, says Karstensen. “In this way, it accumulates and constitutes a continuous supply of microplastics to the oceans for the foreseeable future”, he says.

The countries participating in the OPTOCE project have a combined population of three billion people, half of whom live along the coastlines. They produce about 64 million tonnes of plastic waste annually and are among the biggest consumers of plastics in the world. As a result, they exhibit some of the highest levels of discharge to the oceans.  

These countries all have one thing in common – inadequate plastic waste management capacities.

On the other hand, they also produce about three quarters of the world’s cement, steel and electrical power, all of which takes place in tens of thousands of plants that burn massive volumes of coal and thus contribute to a major proportion of the world’s CO2 emissions.

“The replacement of some of this coal with non-recyclable plastics offers a win-win opportunity," explains Karstensen. “It will prevent the plastics from ending up in the oceans, reduce the need for large volumes of coal, and will indirectly cut greenhouse gas emissions because there will be less need to construct new incineration plants and open new landfill sites," he says.

Facts about plastics in the oceans

Every minute, at least 15 tonnes of plastics are being discharged into the oceans, and this figure is increasing year on year. This means that a total of eight million tonnes of plastic waste end up in the oceans every year. And this does not include the more than five billion tonnes of plastics that are being accumulated inappropriately across the entire planet.

Plastic pollution is one of the world’s fastest growing environmental crises. It represents a problem for the natural world and the climate and is a hazard to public health. Researchers have only recently demonstrated that microplastics can be traced in human bloodstreams, and the consequences of this are very worrying.

The main reason for this pollution is that many of the countries that discharge the largest volumes of plastics to the oceans have either very poor waste management systems, or no such systems at all. More than a third of the world’s plastic waste is not directed to a collection system, and only nine percent is recycled.

Another reason for plastic pollution is that the use of disposable plastic is very high in many countries, and this generates enormous volumes of unnecessary plastic waste.

Plastics represent only ten percent of the world’s total volume of waste, but nevertheless account for the majority of marine pollution.

Cost-effective, resource-effective and the most environmentally friendly

Cement production requires massive volumes of coal and other raw materials. However, all of these components can be substituted, either entirely or in part, by waste that contains energy and/or inorganic components. The substitution process is normally called co-processing.

This approach has been shown to be cost-effective, resource-effective and environmentally friendly when compared to combustion in an incinerator. The energy exploitation efficiency is much higher than in modern incinerators that generate energy from waste. Nor are any residual products generated, compared with about 30 percent by volume in a traditional incinerator.

As well as waste from paper manufacturing plants, the researchers are looking into the feasibility of exploiting non-recyclable plastics taken from large rivers, landfill sites, industrial plants and cities in local cement factories.

This article appears courtesy of Gemini News and may be found in its original form here

The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Maritime Executive.