EU Joins Complaint Over S. Korean Shipbuilding Subsidies

The EU has signaled that it will join Japan in a formal World Trade Organization complaint against South Korean shipbuilding subsidies, citing the impact on European shipyards and maritime equipment manufacturers. 

"[Japan's] request for consultations relates to a number of alleged export and local content subsidies provided by Korea directly, or through public or private institutions, to Korean shipbuilders or their customers," the EU wrote in a letter to the WTO last week. "The measures referred to . . . may have a substantial impact on the price of ships, including ship engines and other maritime equipment, and affect trade flows in these products."

On November 6, Japan initiated a WTO dispute complaint against the government of South Korea over subsidies for the Korean shipbuilding industry. Japan claims that Korean policy measures - including funds, loans, guarantees, insurance and other financing for the "Big Three" South Korean shipbuilders - violate the WTO's Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994.

Stay on Top of the Daily Maritime News The maritime news
that matters most

Get the latest maritime news delivered to your inbox daily.

Subscribe Now

Japan's government alleges that these measures amount to "producer support" - direct financing that keeps companies in business and allows them to offer below-market prices - and "sales support," designed to promote sales for Korean shipbuilders during periods of low demand. Japan also noted the significant involvement of Korean government-owned policy banks in bailing out Korean shipbuilders during the 2015-17 industry downturn. 

Under the WTO's dispute resolution process, the parties will have 60 days of "consultations" to discuss the complaint. The EU will participate as a formal third party to the discussions. At the end of the 60-day period, a dispute panel will be established to adjudicate the matter and issue a binding ruling. If the losing party does not implement corrections, the WTO can authorize retaliatory trade measures.