Shipping Recovery Prospects Test Investor Nerves
Research consultancy Maritime Strategies International (MSI) has forecast a stormy road to recovery for the shipping industry, with uneven supply/demand trends set to test the nerve of investors and operators.
Addressing the Hansa Forum in Hamburg, Germany last week, MSI Senior Analyst James Frew warned that the industry will continue to face multiple challenges to a sustained recovery despite positive demand fundamentals.
“The commodity shipping sectors remain well correlated with each other - with the exception of offshore and LPG - and most sectors are positively correlated, but not tightly so,” said Frew. “So the question is whether it is supply or demand that is wrecking the markets?”
In demand terms, headline trade in goods and services has stalled in relation to GDP and policy decisions rather than fundamentals, hold the key to future direction. Factors including increased energy efficiency, slowing containerization demand and reshoring are all threats. However, the demand side is far from all bad news.
“How many ships are needed to meet demand projections is a function of multiple factors; routes taken and their distance, sailing speed, port waiting times, operating days, ballast ratio, cargo carrying capacity and vessel size changes,” added Frew. “Taking these factors into account, incremental vessel requirements until 2019 show that more ships are needed to meet projected demand in sectors such as oil, product and chemical tankers, bulk carriers and container ships.”
According to MSI data, ships required versus ships on order exceed projected demand for product tankers and chemical carriers but lag for bulk carriers and container ships. This is thanks to the industry’s self-prescribed medicine, with 2016 scrapping levels at or near record levels in the bulk carrier and container ship sectors.
“The elephant in the room remains shipyard capacity. The ‘addition’ phases of 2000-2010 and 2014-2016 have not been balanced by the subsequent contractions and capacity elasticity remains a threat to supply/demand balance,” said Frew.
Looking to future prospects, it is clear that historical average earnings are no guide to forward earnings. Mean Absolute Percentage Error calculations for a 1yr T/C rate on a Panamax bulk carrier fluctuate wildly between the five and 10 year average and in historical terms since 1970.
“The recovery is going to be uneven at best, with a disproportionate increase in vessel earnings for LNG carriers, tankers and LPG carriers. Even with improvements, earnings for container ships and bulkers will not approach their pre-crisis highs,” said Frew. “Shipyards will continue to suffer from a lack of forward cover next year and only cost pressure will stop newbuilding prices falling further in 2018.”
The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Maritime Executive.